|
||||||
  |
||||||
|
Home » RESOURCE CENTER » An Intergroup Activity |
|||
![]() ![]() ![]() |
| ACTIVITIES | MODULES & THEORIES | QUESTIONNARIES, INVENTORIES & SURVEYS | TIPS |
Goals
? To explore the impact of competition between groups.
? To demonstrate different methods of group problem solving.
? To examine the dynamics of suspicion and distrust in a group.
? To observe the process of a leaderless group in the completion of a specific task.
Group Size
A minimum of two subgroups with six to ten participants each (subgroups should be of equal size).
Time Required
Approximately one and one-half hours.
Materials
? One set of fourteen blocks for each subgroup and another set from which the facilitator constructs the model (see Directions for Making a Spy Model).
? A Spy Team Design Instruction Sheet for each participant.
? An envelope containing Spy Special Instructions for each participant. (On each sheet, the facilitator is to mark an “x,” by hand, in the block next to the words “You are not a spy.”)
? Two Spy Team Design Work Sheets for each subgroup.
? A watch for each timekeeper.
? A copy of the Spy Timekeeper Sheet for each timekeeper.
? A copy of the Spy Observer Sheet for each observer.
? Pencils for each observer, timekeeper, and subgroup.
? Newsprint and a felt-tipped marker.
Physical Setting
Two rooms, or one room with a small partitioned-off area for placement of the model. One room should be large enough for each subgroup to work at a separate table. The model is placed on a table in the second room or partitioned area.
Process
1. The facilitator forms equal subgroups of six to ten members each. Volunteers are solicited to function as observers and timekeepers (one of each for each subgroup). Each subgroup is then assigned to a work table.
2. A set of blocks is apportioned to each subgroup. A Spy Team Design Instruction Sheet and an envelope containing Spy Special Instructions are given to each participant. A watch, a Spy Timekeeper Sheet, and a pencil are given to each timekeeper. A Spy Observer Sheet and a pencil are handed to each observer; and two Spy Team Design Work Sheets and a pencil are given to each subgroup.
3. The facilitator reviews the Spy Team Design Instruction Sheet with the members and informs them that:
? There may be one or more spies in a subgroup.
? Members may write on the work sheets, but may not take the work sheets with them when they view the model.
? Subgroups may arrange their blocks in order, so long as no two blocks are touching.
5. The facilitator informs the subgroups of the location of the model and gives the signal to begin the activity.
6. When one hour has passed, the facilitator calls time. The timekeepers for each subgroup give their reports, and the facilitator records the scores on newsprint. Then the observer from each subgroup makes a report. The facilitator leads a discussion of the following group processes: the impact of competition between groups; methods of group problem solving; and the interaction between members of a leaderless group. He or she may relate these to time scores and the productivity of the subgroups.
7. The facilitator divulges the fact that there were no spies in any subgroup, and the total group discusses the behavior surrounding this issue. The group members can also discuss any feelings they may have experienced about being misled on this point.
8. Finally the facilitator discusses the learning’s gained from the activity and their application to real-life situations.
Variations
? To increase competition between subgroups, a small amount of money can be collected from each participant as a prize for the winning team.
? To examine intergroup dynamics, one essential block from each subgroup can be given to another subgroup.
? To assist subgroups, one or more correct numbers may be written in advance on each work sheet.
? To aid in timing the competition segment, a sixty-minute cassette tape can be made with the “time remaining” announced at fifteen-minute intervals for forty-five minutes, five-minute intervals for the next ten minutes, one-minute intervals for the next four minutes, and fifteen-second intervals for the last minute.
? Different materials can be used.? Planning minutes can “cost” one point each and assembly minutes three points each in order to determine a winning team.Submitted by Stephen J. Schoen.
DIRECTIONS FOR MAKING A SPY MODEL
Each subgroup receives a set of fourteen blocks. Twelve of the blocks are needed to duplicate the model.
The blocks can be made out of 2" x 2" wooden cubes. The top and bottom of each block are blank; the sides are painted with the figures specified below:
Figures | |
Block | Side 1Side 2Side 3Side 4 |
1 2 *3* 4 5 6 7 8 9 *10* 11 12 13 14 | 5 7 7 7 1 1 5 8 4 2 8 ? 9 90 ? ? 6 9 4 ? 9 2 3 3 6 4 48 1 1 4 0 8 ? 2 ? 9 2 ? 1 17 ? ? ? 3 6 0 ? 5 7 0 ? ? ? |
| *Block not needed to constructed model. |
SPY SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS
(For your eyes only . . .)
In real life, all group members do not always work for the same goals. Sometimes people do things to reach personal rather than group goals. They may work against group goals because of group friction, lack of trust, inability to get along with a supervisor, etc. There may be such a person in your subgroup. We will call that person a “spy.” It is possible that more than one spy may be in a subgroup.
If you are a spy, you are to do everything in your power to hinder the efforts of your subgroup, without letting anyone know that you are a spy.
If a subgroup member thinks that another member is a spy, he or she can accuse that person of spying. The rest of the subgroup will vote, and if there is unanimous agreement, the spy can be excluded from any further deliberations of the subgroup.
? You are not a spy.
1. Visits to model: x fifteen seconds ? min. sec.
2. Construction time: ? min. sec.
3. Total construction time (item 1 plus item 2) ? min. sec.
Did any one member emerge as a leader?
Did other subgroup roles emerge, such as tension reliever, organizer, etc.?
Was there friction in the subgroup? Why?
Did people wonder who the spy was?
How was the preparation time used?
How was the construction time used?
Describe the level of teamwork you observed:
Who were high participators? Low participators?
Any other observations: